First of all, did anybody actually heard that there were
more than 100 riots since Samajwadi party came to office (even two years of its
tenure haven’t been completed yet)?
Do you know there is official toll of 40+ riots in UP
over their tenure. Even in Mayawati’s (she is one of the most corrupt leader of
India) tenure; there wasn't a single.
What you will get from this post: -
·
Answer to why riots happen in India?
·
Who really benefits from (#UPriots /
#Muzzafar) riots?
·
Were terrorists involved in the riots?
·
Was it a local issue?
·
Is BJP or RSS really involved?
·
Are there any conspiracies involved?
·
Who benefits from these massacres?
·
Why we are still Hindus/Muslims/Sikhs etc
instead of Indians?
·
Is there a solution to this ongoing problem?
·
Are these recent developments or they having
any historical sentiment attached?
·
What is damaging India leftism/ rightism or
secularism/communal-ism or there is something else?
·
Should Muslims loosen up, if yes; then why
not Hindus?
Really the list can go on and I can’t answer directly
answer all but I will for sure provide you with a write which will attempt to
provide you with the understanding of these problem in insightful way. Because
when people are direct usually they are labeled with fancy names so I would generally
try to avoid that but somewhere if the situation demands then I won’t hesitate
& I will be blunt & bold in my approach. I am against all organized
religions except the one you will encounter nearing the end of this post
“Dude-ism”.
So what happened when SP came, what changed actually
nothing except Azam Khan has been given more power? And I think; if I am no
wrong he draws more power whenever there is a riot. SP has tenures before so
what changed, it has pro Muslim stance (appeasement with more intensity than
congress) since the time of Babri Masjid Demolition (** see in the last) &
subsequent killing of kar-sewaks.
So, why saviors of Muslims (as they say) want riots? That’s the million
dollar question. Its answer is not that simple, every conspiracy no matter from
where you took example from; wasn't devised by any single incident or by any
one individual. There were always unrelated events which founded a common goal unconsciously
(it could be in somebody’s head but I don’t buy that one person consciously did
this or that). I am not giving Azam khan a clean chit but indicating of other
possibilities. Say media is blabbering that who will benefit from this riot;
obvious answer which people want to say is nobody (but MSM has something else)
but there is more, SP people are telling that due to polarizing effect BJP is
benefitting but same goes for SP/BSP/Congress.
We know that SP has always had the support of Muslim
clerics but this time; all are against him. And congress is able to regain
their confidence. So are you getting my drift, Muslims now want Congress more
than SP and Azam khan is Congress’s best bet. Because he has the reputation of
being resigning all the time.(this year when 40 people died in Kumbh mela
stampede which was under his supervision; he offered his resignation, not like
Narendra Modi who stick-ed to his post after riots and took responsibility to
built Gujarat as a model state; this guy doesn't take responsibilities he just
takes innocent lives and then offer his resignation which yadavs never accept.
They just tell him it’s not your fault Beta it’s just your fate you are born
with a tag “Maut ka Saudagar”). So when he will join the congress, people would
think (at least Muslims will & that’s what he actually wants) that he isn’t
related to any misdeeds of SP; so he will come clean & maybe in future CM
of UP. He would be the good guy & yadavs would be the bad ones.
Let’s see who is Azam Khan? It’s an irony that even
Muslims don’t know who the hell he is. He is a self made leader no doubt but
his influence never reached beyond his Rampur (famous for knives across the
world “Rampuri”) or his brief stint at Aligarh Muslim University so he wasn't even a proper Muslim face as SP boasts of. Americans held him in Boston and
said that they were questioning him with regards to funding of SP by Al-Qaeda (well I don’t care from where they received money at least they weren't giving
away), we know Americans like it to show we Indians what’s our worth now and
then, however he took it personal. But he is cunning more than those Yadavs
thinks of themselves. He was nothing but now SP made him a leader and he is
waiting now for Congress to make an offer; he won’t be able to refuse.
Nobody expected or is expecting that move but congress
has played its cards, it will make a deal with Azam or not; doesn't matter now.
Even it doesn't matter if SP loses-Congress wins or vice-versa because both are
sides of same coin.
But sure polarizing will benefit to BJP as well but to
what extent; it’s the BJP which has lost it all. Sure some Hindus who were
affected by riots will think that NaMo is their only savior but what about the
others who now are in a dilemma due to constant doses of blabbering
(conditioning) of MSM (Main Stream Media).
Foreign media & Social media were the only one which
came out with truth because MSM don’t even bothers unless someone from minority
is killed as if their reporting of a killing of a man from majority community
would amount to being communal or a big tragedy. Well even if they think so,
they shouldn't at least report wrong details, TOI reported that majority
community killed two minority youth & they even didn't apologized as per my
limited knowledge as I am no regular reader of TOI.
Well these daily recurring minor riots have forced me to
delve deeper in the psyche of the riots & rioter. I will speak of facts
only & they will speak for themselves so if anybody got offended then it’s
not my fault. I assure you to be blunt in my assessment & judgment and this
goes for everyone including my Muslims friend (take it literally as other
Muslims are covered in everyone itself).
Here I am going to answer some question which bother us
but nobody dares to answer them due to fear of losing friends, family, job,
being label-ed as communal et cetera.
Here is a link of a FB post on the riots & see how
people don’t react to these things; the reason I already mentioned above.
Let’s take a brief synopsis of some latest #UPriots starting
with the Muzzafar-nagar one.
#Muzzafarnagar riots- One
Muslim boy eve-teased or tried to rape (now it can’t be known for obvious
reasons) a Jat girl (I am not a caste-ist; there is a reason why I am using it
which you will realize later). Her brother beats the guy but a group of Muslims
intervenes and kills both the brothers on the spot. This made everybody angry
as those brothers were beating a guy who may do the same with any other girl;
even a Muslim girl so why were Muslims taking his side. Now there was a khap
panchayat (community specific assembly) demanding justice but they were ignored
so they organized another Maha-panchayat and when the people were returning
Muslims attacked them & killed some people. Now Azam khan wakes up from his
deep slumber (he was the head for whole of Western UP affairs) as he knew that
there would be retaliation from Jat side, called army in & suspends (which
is said to have created an administrative vacuum in the area) some police official
for following his orders to not do anything. Now due to military in city/towns
retaliation grew in the villages and suddenly all the Muslim clerics started
making hue & cry of mis-governance. Now everybody started blaming BJP, BKU
(Farmers union which is said to have organized the assembly in which anti
Muslims speeches were made) & some silly video. Now see for yourself who
started riot & who incited them. Official toll is 50 something killed
(ongoing).
#Meerut riots- at
the time of Ramadan/ Ramzan some Hindus were singing bhajans (even it puts me
off too) or something in temple so some Muslims objected to it but Hindus
continued then they came with weapons and the riot started there in temple
compound. Official toll 2 killed.
#Koshikala riot- It
is believed (as this one was the least reported) that some Hindus were
distributing free sharbat (drink made with milk, water, sugar & condiment) on
some religious occasion then a Muslim spit in the drum containing the sharbat
so they thrashed this guy then after few minutes there was a Muslim mob which
not only attacked those guys but burned down the whole market area. One guy on
FB has reported the incident very precisely with lots of photos attached. There
was Azam khan connection. Don’t know the official toll but un-official is 250+
killed & FB photos of that post too indicated that it’s could be true.
There is abundance of riots in UP & India. But I
limit myself to these three latest riot; of course there were others but as
they were under-reported so don’t know much about them. And of course you can
always dig the internet & I wish you do it because the more you dig;
quicker you will get closer to the truth.
All the areas were under control of Azam Khan & if
UPites (Hindus) are to be believed he is the one doing it but I don’t buy it. I
don’t buy Congress or others too because when these guys weren't even in
existence; the same things were happening.
Let’s take some MSM blabbering & intelligentsia
theories, they say that riots were invented by sangh parivar by using trickery like planting fake cow killing, Hindus killing, fake video, temple
attacked & blah blah. We all know & it’s a world recognized fact that
Hindus are the most tolerant of all that’s why they got fuc*ed often. And we
know that most of Muslims are converted Hindus so how come tolerant people
become intolerant just by change of faith (let’s leave it for some time &
focus on general Muslims first).
Let’s see some more incidents i.e. Azad maidan incident
in Mumbai, violence over the American film “Innocence of Muslims” (however it
was offensive but that much violence over it can’t ever be justified), Danish
cartoonist incident etc. Even there was an article written by a Muslim about
Muslims getting too much violent these days on niticentral.com in 2012.
So is there a problem with the Muslims? Well maybe but
what I see is Muslim cleric have been doing all these sh*t. I don’t think an
ordinary Muslim wants to kill Tasleema or Salman Rushdie but it’s always the
cleric or political leaders. This goes for Sikhs, catholic & some Hindu
cleric too (save the religion cry). I saw one article by Kanchan gupta on
Niticenral.com (well this website is exact opposite of “The Hindu” newspaper
& highly recommended as it seems to be the one man army against MSM to me)
stating some fatwas issued by Deobandis. It clearly shows how they have
conditioned the psyches of Muslims
Also check this one too for better understanding as some
people were claiming on FB that AK-47 shots were heard from Masjids/Madrassas
in Muzzaffarnagar riots and now its 41 cartridges have been found too which
confirms ISI connection. Also everybody knows the nick name used for
Muzzarfar-nagar & Azam garh “choota pakistan” not because majority
population is Muslim but due to ISI connections. It also hints that it was
pre-planned.
Even highly publicized riots likes of 2002 & 1993
have the same element in them. In 1993 police found nearly 50 AK-47s & lots
of “Asla-barood” some of which rocked Mumbai & Sangh was criminalized; the
blame was put on Babri Masjid demolition. (** see in the last).
In 2002 Muslim mob torched Sabarmati express which too
was pre-planned which led to riots but NaMo was criminalized but let’s stick to
the point. Those who want to know reality of NaMo or 2002 riots read “Modinama”
free eBook by Madhu purnima kishwar
Or my previous post to this blog. The reason I mentioned
this is that even at that time it is well recorded fact that Masjids/ mosques
were used by rioters and cry for “Islam is in danger”, “there is poison in
milk” etc were made.
So religion which is supposed to give us peace of mind is
found to be the real culprit and more than it; are the clerics who in the guise
of protecting or defending it make people kill innocent people.
I seriously don’t want this attack on Islam in particular
but Muslims seems to be easily brainwashed when it comes to defending their
religion at least that is what the facts shows and if it’s their clerics then
the burden for it rests on their shoulder as I am here to defend the
country& not any particular religion. And I don’t want only Islam to be put
under scrutiny but all the others organized religion; be it Hinduism
(semi-organized), Christianity or Sikhism. Of course Jainism & Buddhism can
never be included in the same league but I don’t promote them either; as
religion has only made us humans to differentiate between fellow human beings.
I never said to anyone whether Leftism is good or Rightism political views; as
both are bad in extreme form. When you are Muslim; I automatically become
Kaafir/ non-Muslim for you. Also most of the religions are too sick to promote
non-vegetarianism (this isn't attack on Islam in particular as even ancient
Hinduism is said to be promoting non-veg, Judaism, Christianity, etc). How
anybody’s god/ prophet can ever differentiate between humans & other
animals? To this they say that even plants are living things so why you kill
them. Answer is simple ask your conscience when you kill a plant or an animal,
you will know which one is ethical/moral. And even one can easily infer that
Humans can’t eat non-organic thing so the nature has provided them with semi
living things i.e. plants; which are semi conscious too. And the argument that
they have 2 of 5 senses doesn't hold water either. Well this discussion is for
another day but I mentioned it here as non-vegetarianism makes us cruel &
violent. Violence leads to violence; as somebody said.
Let me shed some more light, whenever any Muslim questioned
the fundamentals of Islam he got killed or a fatwa in his/her name was issued. (From
Salman rushdie to Tasleema nasreen). See the cold blooded murders of Muslim
atheist bloggers in Bangladesh in 2012. Even now new breed of vegetarian
Muslims are emerging in the west where clerics can’t do anything, so they now
funds lots of NGO’s which do the lobbying for them. There are new websites
emerging daily which comes up with lots of convincing arguments in favor of
anything & everything related to Islam. So it’s both a good as well as bad
news.
India always has been the guiding light to the world but
now it is totally ruined. West is coming up with great ideas day by day but we
are still messed up in religions. Western atheist society has come up with a
new religion called #Dudeism not a typical religion but it’s the neo form of
atheism, humanism etc. Its only message is to just “let it go” & “be a dude”.
Don’t worry about god/devil or heaven/hell. Just be yourself & let the
nature be your guide. (This is what I make sense of it & official motto may
differ). Well I don’t need a label for me but young people (though, I am young
too) like these kind of fancy stuff; so it’s your chance to become human, not
any Hindu or Muslim.
Don’t let your parents dictate your life just because
their parents did the same to them, it’s not you who is Muslim/Hindu/Christian;
it’s only your parents who made you that even without your consent, you are
only human. Leave the holy war for the god to fight; if there is really any
danger to religion. You have to take a decision to come out of this vicious
cycle of religion, it was only devised to organize people into armies for the
conquests by kings with the help of priests or by themselves (check the growth
of any organized religion), otherwise you would end up baptizing your children
too. I am not telling to abhor/discard all the good deeds that religions have
come up with in thousands of years, that experiential knowledge doesn't need
allegiance to any religion. See everybody is doing yoga without becoming a
Hindu.
You might be thinking that I
have lost track but everything is related see I read one article in 2004 written
by a Muslim guy (probably) in Punjab Kesari (Hindi daily). (I was like 16 years
old that time & my biggest aim was to just bang a girl and punjab kesari
had good photographs & that worked like porn at that time because of high
testosterone level I guess. The moot point is I wasn't interested in politics
at all but I read that article because it was insightful). He stated that
Muslims have to change some things if they want a peace; they should try to be
more Indian rather than being Muslim, try not to live in Muslim ghettos only. Higher
fertility rate cause fear among others (* see below for details). He even said
that when one uses skull cap without any religious program it shows that he
fears & cap shields it. He feels secure between Muslims so he wants others
to know that he is Muslim (to let other Muslims know) in case of a riot like
situation which works sometimes. It’s totally psychology just like you see a
policeman, army-men, RSS, Sikhs etc. It helps members of your organization to
identify their members. Why Sikhs were made to wear turban? The real reason is
what I am telling you not the fancy one the cleric says. These symbolic things
have meanings attached to them & are very easy to comprehend but due to
religious conditioning/brainwashing we don’t.
Buddha once said that never believe anything just because
it is said by someone of big repute or it’s written in a book even when I said
it,
Question anything & everything
Then only form your judgment or whatever.
And I am reiterating myself, I am not fuc*ing with
anybody’s religion in particular, I don’t have knowledge of any religion in
particular & I don’t want it. I am a man of reason & logic. And I want to
help in making this world a better place to live so I am providing you these
kinds of assessments for forming an informed decision, of course I may be wrong
in some things please point it out so that I may improve it & include it in
coming post. There is no point is criticizing everything while sitting idle at
home, forming opinions on the basis of crap provided by MSM without doing our
homework. Intellectual vomiting hasn't done anything; we are still facing the
same problems.
(* ) Religious demography of India by center for policy
studies, Chennai
This eBook has some interesting facts about India,
demography and it attempts to identify the reasons why conflict arises in
Indian populace.
Don’t have enough time read this article or just continue
reading the post (can’t do nothing of you guys)
See the footnote of this table.
Now you can see for yourself what I was talking about,
it’s not that typical; use of little brains and you know what’s what.
(**) This is actually a story for a video project but as
it got stalled so it’s here
Babri Masjid/Ram
Mandir Issues
Introduction:
- I know most of the people say just “I am not interested in politics at all”
but does it help, we have to accept the reality; politics affects us all whether
we are interested or not. Also people don’t want to talk politics in public
because they want to be seen as a secular person but when they do that very
moment they became pseudo secular, as secular means to be just & right in
your approach towards everyone without checking his/her religion. It doesn't mean that you have to hide behind the veil of secularism whenever some
controversial matter arises.
Now let’s
come to the main topic, Babri Masjid was built on a site which now has been
proved to be a temple dedicated to Lord Ram; whom some believe to be an
incarnation of God & other believe him to be a great personality & some
mythical but there is one thing for sure that he has been one of the most
important & influential icon/idol for all; not only for Hindus but for
Muslims, Sikhs & others alike. So if we people of India wants to built on
that very birth place of Ram a magnificent temple; would it not make all of us
happy/proud or whatever. Even if it’s a myth, even then it would have much more
impact than a Disneyland, fort of Alice in wonderland. How much excited we feel
about Disneyland, that for shows, novels; there are some places actually
dedicated to them. Wouldn't it be secular enough? Is there a Mughal/ medieval because people behave like this. If it was birth place of Prophet Muhammad then
everybody would have been singing different tunes. Ram is not the property of
Hindus but of whole of the Bharat.
You have to decide whether you are a
Hindu/Muslim/Sikh or an Indian. Nationalism is too a narrow concept but for the
larger good we have to stick to it. We have to realize that religion is
personal/private matter. When we differentiate ourselves from others conflict
is bound to arise.
Why we have to carry burden of Mughals on our shoulders,
well everybody knows that more than 70-80% Muslims are converted from Hindus in
present day India. And some of them still haven’t stopped using their ancient
surnames. Also there were forced conversions but my point is that whether you
are a real one or not; the country you have dwell-ed in for thousands of years
has a culture which is not just limited to original inhabitants. Rama isn't an
influential factor of Hindus only so why they have been fighting for it since
the independence, more than 10k lives have been laid because of that directly
or indirectly from all communities due to politics. No Muslim cares for a
medieval mosque (this is my observation) or go to that place for prayer for
that matter (however they are constantly believed to be by petty politicians/clerics
who only care for scoring some points in the eyes of Muslims as protector of
Islam/ Muslims) but Hindus have did & they really want to. Some of my
Muslims friends say that make a hospital there but I don’t know what’s the
problem with a temple. So it has got not just cultural but religious sentiments
attached to it which for sure differs from person to person like I want it for
cultural reason. I don’t believe in religion but I do wish to see a grand
temple there. And I don’t wish it to be built by Hindus but by the contribution
of every single Indian who can contribute say Rs. 5 each or according to his ones
capacity.
We can show the world that Religion isn't bigger than our Nation.
Well those Muslims who stayed in India must have believed in India as their
beloved country that’s why they stayed so why we are crying today Hindu-Hindu.
Well some people contested that there wasn't any temple here previously it has
been proved there was. When we associate ourselves to the barbarism &
cruelty of those times don’t we put a stamp authorizing all those wrongdoings?(***
see below) Are Hindus asking for restoration of all the temples, don’t we know
that there are not hundreds but thousands of temples being destroyed &
mosques are built there; even with using the same material/ debris? We have
preserved/ accepted TajMahal as an Indian cultural & heritage not as a
Muslim tomb.
We are incurring thousands of crores in managing & preserving
thousand of tombs which nobody cares for. Even Delhi alone has 100s of these
kinds of structures preserved; I don’t see any Hindu objecting then why all the
principles are laid down for the Hindus alone. And when I use Muslim or Hindu
here it only refers to those; whom we want to have a moment of introspection.
Do our actions or no action affecting others? Sure they do if Muslims have
protested the partition on a large scale, there wouldn't have been one. If we
don’t speak for ourselves then some other person will and then we will be
forced to accept his decision and to accept the consequences thereof.
(***) Also I want to tell you here one more thing there
are not hundreds but thousands of historical places/ temples which are disputed
due to clerics. I went to a site in Barnawa which is in western UP; believed to
be the palace where Pandawas in Mahabharata were to be burned down but they
escaped by digging a Surang (tunnel) which I saw there but Muslim cleric say
it’s their religious place so in future someday some riot would be attributed
to it too. As I mentioned earlier there are thousands of such kind of disputed
sites so we should urge the government to form a committee to look into the
matter so that we can avoid any future riot.
No comments:
Post a Comment